IN
USA
CA
IN
Most people know India has a law against workplace sexual harassment. Far fewer know that India also has specific, enforceable legal protections for transgender persons and for people living with HIV at the workplace.
These are not aspirational policy documents. They are Acts of Parliament with penalties for non-compliance. And yet, a significant number of Indian companies, large and small, are operating without any awareness that these laws exist, let alone what they require.
October is Global Diversity Awareness Month. It is a good moment to move past diversity conversations that stay at the surface level and get specific about the laws that already exist, the protections they guarantee, and the gap between what the law says and what most workplaces are actually doing.
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
India’s Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act was passed in 2019 and its Rules notified in 2020. It is the first comprehensive national legislation in India specifically addressing the rights of transgender persons across multiple domains of life, including education, employment, housing, and healthcare.
At the workplace, the Act is unambiguous.
What the law prohibits
No employer can deny a transgender person employment, terminate them, deny them a promotion, or make their employment conditions hostile on the basis of their gender identity. The Act specifically prohibits:
Denial of a right to employment. Termination from employment. Denial of promotion. Denial of pay equal to that of other employees for the same work. Preventing access to any establishment.
These are not soft guidelines. They are statutory prohibitions. A transgender employee who faces any of these actions has legal recourse.
What employers are required to do
The Act places positive obligations on employers, not just prohibitions. Employers with 100 or more employees are required to designate a complaints officer to address discrimination complaints from transgender employees.
This is a parallel mechanism to the Internal Committee under PoSH. Just as the IC handles complaints of sexual harassment, the designated complaints officer handles discrimination complaints under the Transgender Persons Act. Most companies have no idea this requirement exists.
Beyond the designated officer, the broader obligation is to provide a safe and non-discriminatory environment. This includes ensuring that workplace policies, facilities, and conduct do not create a hostile experience for transgender employees.
Where companies fall short
The most common gap is not intentional hostility but a complete absence of inclusion. Gender-neutral restrooms do not exist. HR systems accept only binary gender options. Job application forms and employee records have no provision for anyone outside the male and female categories. Dress code policies are gendered without any accommodation. Onboarding processes do not acknowledge the possibility of a transgender employee joining.
These are not edge cases. They are design failures in systems built without transgender people in mind. And when a transgender employee joins and encounters these failures on day one, that is already a hostile environment, regardless of anyone’s intention.
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 has also been introduced, signaling that the legislative framework in this area is actively evolving. Companies that are not engaging with the existing law will find themselves even further behind as it develops.
The HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017
Less widely discussed than the Transgender Persons Act but equally significant is the HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017, which came into force across India in 2018.
This law was three decades in the making and consolidated years of advocacy from public health and human rights organizations. Its workplace provisions are specific and enforceable.
What the law prohibits at the workplace
The Act explicitly prohibits discrimination against a person living with HIV or AIDS in the context of employment. This covers:
Denial of, or termination from, employment. Denial of equal pay for equal work. Denial of promotion. Unfair treatment or creation of a hostile work environment.
The prohibition extends not just to the person living with HIV but also to anyone perceived to be living with HIV, or anyone associated with a person living with HIV. A caregiver spouse who faces discrimination because their partner has disclosed an HIV status is also protected.
The right to confidentiality
One of the most important and most violated provisions of the Act relates to disclosure. No employer has the right to require an employee or job applicant to disclose their HIV status. No pre-employment HIV testing is permitted. No medical examination that includes an HIV test can be made a condition of employment.
This is significant because in many industries, particularly hospitality, manufacturing, and healthcare, HIV testing was historically either required or informally expected. The 2017 Act makes this illegal.
An employee’s HIV status is their private health information. Employers cannot demand it, cannot store it, cannot disclose it, and cannot act on it.
The designated complaints mechanism
Like the Transgender Persons Act, the HIV and AIDS Act also provides a complaints mechanism. An ombudsman can be appointed to receive and address discrimination complaints under the Act. Violations can result in penalties including imprisonment of up to two years or a fine of up to Rs one lakh, or both.
These are serious consequences. And yet, awareness of this law in corporate India is extremely limited.
Why Most Workplaces Are Not Compliant
Both laws have been in force for several years. The gaps in compliance are not primarily about legal complexity. They reflect a more fundamental issue: these communities are often invisible in corporate planning.
When HR teams design policies, the default mental model is a workforce of cisgender, non-disabled employees. Transgender employees, employees living with HIV, and other groups whose identities do not fit that default are not considered in the design process. The result is systems, policies, and cultures that passively exclude them before any active discrimination even occurs.
There are a few specific patterns worth naming.
Disclosure pressure
Many workplaces create implicit pressure to disclose health or identity information that employees are under no obligation to share. Group health insurance enrollment forms that require information beyond what is needed. Medical examinations that go beyond job requirements. Informal questions during the hiring process about personal circumstances. These are not always malicious. They are often just thoughtless. But thoughtless disclosure pressure is still a legal risk and a human one.
No policy coverage
The majority of Indian company handbooks, HR policies, and anti-discrimination statements do not specifically name transgender employees or people living with HIV. General non-discrimination language is not the same as specific protection. An employee looking at a company’s policy documents to understand their rights should be able to find them named.
No complaints mechanism
The Transgender Persons Act requires a designated complaints officer for larger employers. Very few companies have this role. Without a complaints mechanism, even employees who know their rights have no clear path to address violations.
No manager training
Managers are the people who make day-to-day decisions about promotions, assignments, leave, and team culture. If managers have never been introduced to either of these laws, or to the lived realities of transgender colleagues and colleagues living with HIV, their decisions will reflect that gap. Training is not about lecturing managers on sensitivity. It is about giving them accurate information so they do not inadvertently create legal exposure for themselves and the company.
What Inclusion Actually Looks Like Here
Moving from legal compliance to genuine inclusion requires more than ticking boxes. But the boxes are a reasonable place to start.
For transgender inclusion, the practical steps include: updating HR systems to accommodate non-binary gender options, making restrooms gender-neutral where feasible, reviewing dress codes for gender-neutral language, including gender identity in non-discrimination and anti-harassment policies by name, and designating a complaints officer as required by law.
For HIV-related inclusion, the steps include: removing any HIV testing requirements from employment processes, ensuring health and medical forms do not collect HIV status, training HR and managers on the confidentiality provisions of the 2017 Act, and making sure employee health information management systems comply with the confidentiality requirements the law mandates.
Neither of these is primarily an expense. They are largely policy and awareness changes. The barrier is usually not cost but knowledge, which is exactly why these laws remain so poorly implemented years after they were passed.
These Laws Exist Because the Need Is Real
It is worth pausing on why these laws were passed in the first place.
The Transgender Persons Act emerged from decades of advocacy, Supreme Court directives including the landmark NALSA judgment of 2014, and sustained evidence that transgender persons faced systematic exclusion from employment, education, and public life. Unemployment rates among transgender communities in India remain significantly higher than the general population. Workplace discrimination is a documented, pervasive reality, not a theoretical concern.
The HIV and AIDS Act emerged from an equally long history of stigma that caused real harm. People who disclosed their HIV status lost jobs, were denied promotions, were isolated by colleagues, and faced family and social consequences on top of managing a health condition. The law was designed to make those outcomes illegal because they were happening at scale.
When a company says it is committed to an inclusive workplace, these are the communities that commitment is tested against. Not the easy cases.
What This Has to Do With Your Workplace Right Now
Global Diversity Awareness Month tends to generate a lot of content about gender parity at leadership levels and visible representation. Both of those matter. But inclusion that stops at visible diversity metrics and does not engage with legal protections for the most marginalized employees is incomplete.
The question worth sitting with this October is not “do we have a diversity policy?” but “does our policy specifically name and protect transgender employees and employees living with HIV, and do we have the systems and training to back that up?”
If the answer is no or not sure, that is the gap to close before the year ends.
Kelp works with organizations across India on DEI advisory, inclusion training, and building workplace frameworks that go beyond the visible diversity conversation. If you want to understand where your organization stands on these specific obligations, reach out to start the conversation.
